ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
In the Matter of: RESUME NORMAL OPERATIONS. On April 1, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court issued Administrative Order No. 2022-34 rescinding nearly all the previous pandemic-related administrative orders that have governed the Courts in Arizona for that past 25 months and directing, inter alia, that all Arizona Courts shall resume normal operations. On April 7, 2022, the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In And For The County Of Maricopa issued Administrative Order No. 2022-043, inter alia, terminating Superior Court Administrative Order No. 2021-105, regarding Municipal Court pandemic-related operations and procedures. In reference to Administrative Order No. 2022-043. Court has issued and signed Administrative Order No. 2022-021 Resuming normal operations effective April 15th, 2022.
In the Matter of: ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATIO OF PRESUMPTIVE STANDARDS FOR REMOTE AND IN-PERSON HEARING FOR THE CITY OF GLENDALE MUNICIPAL COURT. On April 27, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court issued Administrative Order No. 2022-046 adopting the Presumptive Standards as set forth in Appendix 1 of the Report and requires the presiding judge of each municipal court to issue an administrative order adopting standards regarding which hearing types will be held remotely and which hearing types will be held in person. Court has issued and signed Administrative Order No. 2022 - 024, pursuant to Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 2022-46 to take effect on or after October 1, 2022, in the Glendale City Court.
COURT SECURITY
.png "X-Ray Machine")
Glendale City Court has full-time security personnel who are stationed at the main entrance.
Everyone who visits the Court must pass through a metal detector and place all personal belongings through an x-ray machine to be viewed. In addition, persons and personal belongings may be subject to a search. Administrative Order No. 2017-15
Administrative Order 2022-001 allows use of recording devices in a courtroom or courthouse with the permission of the Court. However, camera coverage or use of portable electronic devices may be limited or denied if the harm arising from any of the factors set out in the rules outweighs the benefit to the public of camera use or coverage.