Through the city-wide survey, public forums, and staff and commission meetings, citizens stated the need for improvements to park security and park maintenance.
Action Strategy #1
Protect Glendale?s parks by providing preventive maintenance.
Park Guideline Recommendation:
Review current City of Glendale design maintenance guidelines and create a cost estimating model based on those guidelines.
Action Items
- Develop maintenance guidelines for landscape areas by character (i.e. lawn, non-lawn, slopes, etc.)
Timeline: Y1 - Q1, Responsible Staff: Parks Supervisor- Central District & Parks Supervisor- North District
Cost: Department staff time for research & documentation
Revenue Potential: Lower operational cost expected
- Review landscape design guidelines for appropriateness of materials and water consumption, quality expectations, aesthetic value, and safety issues.
Timeline: Y1 - Q2, Responsible Staff: Parks Supervisor- Central District & Parks Supervisor- North District
Cost: Department Staff time
- Review NRPA and local guidelines, benchmarking against current city guidelines.
Timeline: Y1 - Q3, Responsible Staff: Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- Central District & Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- North District
Cost: Department staff time for research, benchmarking & documentation
- Initiate the development of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CEPTED) guidelines.
Timeline: Y1 - Q4, Responsible Staff: Parks Supervisor-Special Operations & Head Park Ranger
Cost: Department staff time to assist Planning & Engineering Department & Police Department
- Expand public awareness for the value of quality landscape design in parks.
Timeline: Y2 - Q4, Responsible Staff: Graphics Designer
Cost: Department staff time for training and creation of mailers and handouts
Park Guideline Recommendation:
Create a cost/benefit comparison model to serve for in-house versus outsource decisions. Use the model to make decisions regarding outsourcing of services or maintenance.
Action Items
- Outline a flow chart model for all parks activities.
Timeline: Y1 - Q1, Responsible Staff: Parks and Rec. Superintendent-Central District, Parks and Rec. Superintendent-North District & Parks and Rec. Superintendent-Special Operations
Cost: Department staff time
Revenue Potential: None
- Create a baseline performance analysis for each task grouping in the Department for 2001 ? 2006.
Timeline: Y2 - Q1, Responsible Staff: Parks and Rec. Superintendent-Central District, Parks and Rec. Superintendent-North District & Parks and Rec. Superintendent-Special Operations
Cost: Department time to process analysis
Revenue Potential: Revenue can be realized by reducing operational cost
Park Guideline Recommendation:
Create a "Resource Management Plan" that includes staff and equipment scheduling and budgeting to maintain an equitable and fair level of service city wide.
Action Items
- Update inventory for all hardscape and landscape materials used in parks and open space.
Timeline: Y1 - Q1, Responsible Staff: Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- Central District & Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- North District
Cost: Department Staff time
- Utilize current City technology and create G.I.S. database for specific Parks and Recreation items. Purchase required equipment and software and train staff.
Timeline: Y1 - Q2, Responsible Staff: Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- Central District & Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- North District
Cost: Department staff time to assist City Planning Department and hardware/software.
Revenue Potential: Revenue can be realized by reducing operational cost.
- Update current Parks Maintenance Plan with comprehensive summary of all existing parks, trails, open space and canals.
Timeline: Y1 - Q3, Responsible Staff: Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- Central District & Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- North District
Cost: Department time to interview and select software, and budget $20,000 - 30,000 for software.
Revenue Potential: None
- Integrate questions evaluating parks grounds maintenance on public input surveys, the department web page, and mail-back postcard in parks booklet.
Timeline: Y1 - Q4, Responsible Staff: Graphics Designer
Cost: Department staff time to develop survey instruments and analyze feedback.
Revenue Potential: None
- Conduct a thorough staffing need assessment based on new operations and maintenance guidelines.
Timeline: Y1 - Q4, Responsible Staff: Parks and Rec. Superintendent-Central District, Parks and Rec. Superintendent-North District & Parks and Rec. Superintendent-Special Operations
Cost: Department staff time to develop assessment and make recommendations.
Revenue Potential: Revenue can be increased by lowering operational cost through increased efficiency.
- Review and update a "Preventative Maintenance Inventory", and develop a post implementation evaluation process for public and education input.
Timeline: Y2 - Q1, Responsible Staff: Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- Central District & Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- North District
Cost: Department staff time.
Revenue Potential: Revenue can be increased by lowering operational cost through increased efficiency.
Issue
Throughout the Master Plan process the participants expressed a desire to expand their involvement in how their neighborhood parks get developed or redeveloped.
Action Strategy #2
Develop park design guidelines that align closely with recreation program needs and meet community expectations.
Park Guideline Recommendation:
Facilitate the involvement of user groups in park and recreational facility design and planning.
Action Item
- Expand community involvement in park design and planning.
Timeline: Y1 - Q3, Responsible Staff: Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator-Central District and North District.
Cost: Department staff time
Revenue Potential: None
- Establish additional design principles for the parks to meet the needs of the community.
Timeline: Y2 - Q1, Responsible Staff: Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- Central District & Parks and Recreation Project Coordinator- North District
Cost: Department staff time
Revenue Potential: None
|